Optical glass suitable for mold forming

ABSTRACT

An optical glass suitable for mold forming having a metal composition in wt % in terms of metal oxides calculated from the composition of the following components: P 2 O 5  34–50%, Li 2 O 2–9%, Na 2 O 7–28%, K 2 O 3–27%, provided that the total of R 2 O is 17–41% (R: Li, Na, K), Al 2 O 3  6.5–30%, ZnO 0–22%, BaO 0–21%, SrO 0–18%, CaO 0–16%, MgO 0–14%, provided that the total of R′O is 0–34% (R′: Zn, Ba, Sr, Ca, Mg), ZrO 2  0–1.5% and F 1.5–32% relative to the total weight of the oxides, and exhibits a glass transition temperature (Tg) of 350° C. or lower and a specific gravity (Sg) of 3.1 or less and is excellent in chemical durability. The optical glass can be press formed at a low temperature of about 270 to 400° C.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to an optical glass for molding, in particular, an optical glass for a precision molding lens capable of carrying out molding at most 400° C., having a glass transformation temperature (Tg) of at most 350° C. and specific gravity (Sg) of at most 3.1.

BACKGROUND TECHNIQUE

Of late, aspheric lenses or micro optical lenses used in the optical lens system have often been produced by a molding technique using a high precision die without polishing. However, the quality of a die suitable for molding is subject to various limitations from the respect of workability, durability and mass productivity. This indicates that the property of a glass to be molded is also limited. The most important property limited is a softening temperature. Molding of a glass having a softening temperature of 600 to 700° C. or higher, for example, has a large influence upon the life of a die and thus results in lowering of the mass productivity of lenses. Accordingly, it has been considered difficult from the standpoint of mass productivity to mold commercially available optical glasses of all kinds having been marketed and consequently, it becomes a subject of research to develop a glass excellent in moldability.

In JP-A-02-124743, for example, there is disclosed a low softening point, medium refractive index and low dispersion optical glass for precision molded lens, having a yielding point (At) of at most 500° C., refractive index (nd) of 1.53 to 1.62 and Abbe number (ν d) of 59.0 to 64.0, and comprising P₂O₅ and ZnO, as an essential element, and 28 to 49 weight % of ZnO+BaO+SrO+CaO+MgO. This optical glass has such a feature that grinding or polishing after molding is not required because of having a low yielding point (At) and excellent stability, chemical durability, as well as melting property.

JP-A-08-183632 and JP-A-11-139845 have made similar proposals, with which lowering of the softening temperature of the glass is a common subject.

Many of these glasses, however, have softening temperatures of about 400–500° C., since if lower than this temperature range, there arises a problem that chemical durability is lowered and no practical glass is obtained. When the composition of such a glass is so selected as to correspond to the optical properties of commercially available optical glasses, a sufficient softening temperature cannot be obtained sometimes.

Phosphate glasses having relatively a lower softening temperature of oxide glasses have hitherto been proposed as a low softening point glass, for example, as shown in JP-A-60-171244, JP-A-61-036136, JP-A-02-116642, JP-A-02-124743, JP-A-03-040934, JP-A-05-132339, JP-A-08-183632, JP-A-09-278479, JP-A-09-301735, etc.

The inventors have hitherto made efforts to develop a glass capable of being subjected to molding at a low temperature, i.e. at most 400° C., in particular, about 380° C. in the above described oxide glass compositions of phosphate type, and thus have found that it is possible to incorporate a considerable quantity of Al₂O₃ without increasing the quantity of P₂O₅ while increasing in essential manner the quantity of Li₂O, Na₂O and K₂O, whereby the above described problems can be solved. The present patent application has thus been filed (JP-A-2003-026439).

It is well known that in general, addition of fluorine is effective for lowering the softening temperature of glass. However, fluorophosphate glasses up to the present time have often been used for the purpose of realizing the optical properties thereof such as low refractive index, low dispersion property, etc., as disclosed in JP-A-60-210545 or JP-A-63-144141.

Further, a glass described in JP-A-57-027941 is known as a low softening point glass (having a low glass transformation temperature). This fluorophosphate glass is a glass having a glass transformation temperature (Tg) of about 100° C., i.e. very low sortening point glass, but meets with low productivity because of containing a large amount of tin fluorides as a low boiling point compound, resulting in more vaporization during glass melting.

Thus, this glass is not considered suitable for mass production. The glass transformation temperature of about 100° C. is not considered practical as an optical glass.

The phosphate glass described in the former JP-A-02-116642 aims at a low softening point and can contain fluorine in an amount of up to 5%, but this glass does not have an object of positively adding fluorine to lower the softening point and the fluorine is only an additive component.

JP-B-59-033545 of Corning Co. (which will hereinafter be referred to as Corning Publication) discloses a low softenting point glass of fluorophosphate type for molding, having a glass transformation temperature (Tg) of at most about 350° C. This known invention is considered to be based on finding that when Al₂O₃ having hitherto been considered to markedly raise the glass transformation temperature (Tg) simultaneously contains fluorides in an amount of more than 3% of F as an analytical value, Tg of the glass is not markdely raised. And this publication states that it is important for obtaining a low softening point glass excellent in durability to maintain an atomic ratio of the analytical value of F: Al within a range of 0.75 to 5 and that even in Examples, the atomic ratio of F: Al is described. In Claims of the Corning Publication, there is shown % by weight on oxide basis, but this is determined by calculation, not from the component composition, but from the analytical value of the glass after melted.

In Tables 2 and 6 of the Corning Publication, there are shown residual ratios of F when melted under each condition, according to which it is apparent that there is a large dispersion over 9.11 to 69.5% and accordingly, the evaporation quantity of F is felt very large and not even. As one of factors thereof, it is considered that there is a high possibility of a reaction with a crucible. In the invention disclosed in the Corning Publication, there are used various crucibles, for example, a crucible of SiO₂ type very reactive with F or Al₂O₃ affecting the durability thereof, resulting in one factor that the resulting glass composition is fluctuated. Furthermore, in Examples, raw materials containing water of crystallization causing vaporization of P₂O₅ or F are used.

As described above, the Corning Publication does not have a sufficient disclosure, since in Claims, the analytical values of F and a part of Al and the atomic ratios of F: Al are only described and no analytical values of P, Li, Na, K, etc., which are important for lowering the softening point of the glass and have a large influence upon durability, are described, in spite of that the melting conditions are not constant and the final glass composition considered to be largely affected thereby.

Optional components, PbO and CdO are useful as a component for not only raising the refractive index but also giving a low softening point as disclosed in JP-B-40-014301 and are also used in about half of Examples of the Corning Publication, because the other components for giving a low softening point, such as F, P, Li, Na, K, etc., can be reduced by the use of PbO and CdO, which are very effective for lowering the softening point while simultaneously improving the durability. However, PbO or CdO is so poisonous that the use thereof tends to be avoided lately from optical glasses in view of the standpoint of protecting the environmental pollution, and thus it is not preferred to use PbO or CdO.

In the glass composition of phosphate type of JP-A-2003-026439 having lately been filed, the inventors have found that a considerable amount of Al₂O₃ can be incorporated without increasing the amount of P₂O₅ while increasing the amounts of Li₂O, Na₂O and K₂O components as essential components and thus reached an invention relating to a low softening point glass excellent in durability. The present invention is achieved by aiming at further lowering the softening point and improving the durability of the former glass composition and thus incorporating F, as an essential component, thereinto.

However, the present invention is considerably similar to the invention of the Corning Publication, as a whole, since the essential components of the glass composition of the former are same as those of the latter. The difference between the present invention and Corning Invention will now be illustrated:

In the Corning Publication, there are pointed out various problems as described in Prior Art. That is, claims thereof are represented by % by weight based on oxide basis, which is based on not a range calculated from the component composition but an analytical value of the glass obtained by melting, while on the other hand, the claims of the present invention are represented by % by weight based on oxide basis, calculated from the component compositions of Examples. That is, in the present invention, claims thereof are similarly represented by % by weight based on oxide basis, and accordingly, comparison of this with that described in the Corning Publication using the representation obtained from the analytical value of the glass is difficult. Since Examples show only the analytical values of F and Al and as described in Prior Art, have a number of problems relating to evaporation such as melting conditions, such a comparison is meaningless and in other words, the Corning Publication does not have a substantial disclosure of the composition of the present invention.

Thus, the comparison will now be carried out with % by weight based on oxide basis, calculated from the component compositions of Examples. In the present invention, furthermore, PbO, CdO, etc. capable of imparting a low softening point but having poisonous property being generally pointed out are not used from the standpoint of proofing the environmental pollution, so the comparison is concerned with the compositons of Examples free from PbO, CdO, etc.

In Table 1 are shown the composition ranges of weight percents on oxide basis, calculated from Examples of the present invention and Corning Publication. In claims of the Corning Publication, the composition comprises 30 to 75 wt % of P₂O₅, 3 to 25 wt % of R₂O, 3 to 20 wt % of Al₂O₃, more than 3 wt % to less than 24 wt % of F and 0.75 to 5 of F: Al. Accordingly, it is understood therefrom that this composition is largely different from the real composition range calculated from Examples.

It is apparent from Table 1 that in the present invention, the range of P₂O₅ is less than the lower limit of the Corning Publication, the range of R₂O (R: Li, Na, K) is considerably more than the upper limit of the Corning Publication and Li₂O, Na₂O and K₂O are all contained as essential components. The upper limit of Al₂O₃ is considerably more than that of the Corning Publication, although partly overlapped in composition.

This is results of finding according to the present invention that a considerable amount of Al₂O₃ can be incorporated without increasing the amount of P₂O₅ while increasing the amounts of Li₂O, Na₂O and K₂O as essential components, and further lowering of the softening point and improvement of the durability can be realized by incorporating F as an essential component.

As described above, it is apparent that the present invention is different in composition from the invention described in the Corning Publication.

Accordingly, it is the first object of the present invention is to provide an optical glass for molding, in particular, being excellent in workability and chemical durability, and capable of being subjected to precise molding at a low temperature of, e.g., at most 400° C. and having a low transformation temperature (Tg) of at most 350° C. and a specific gravity (Sg) of at most 3.1.

It is the second object of the present invention is to provide with an excellent producibility, an optical glass having optical properties, i.e. refractive index (nd) of 1.43 to 1.55 and Abbe number (ν d) of 55 to 85.

DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION

(1) An optical glass for molding, being excellent in chemical durability and having a transformation temperature (Tg) of at most 350° C. and a specific gravity (Sg) of at most 3.1, which is represented, in term of elements for making up the glass, by the following chemical composition (wt % on oxide basis, calculated from the component composition):

P₂O₅  34 to 50%, Li₂O   2 to 9%, Na₂O   7 to 28%, K₂O   3 to 27%, Sum of R₂O  17 to 41% (R: Li, Na, K), Al₂O₃ 6.5 to 30%, ZnO   0 to 22%, BaO   0 to 21%, SrO   0 to 18%, CaO   0 to 16%, MgO   0 to 14%, Sum of R′O   0 to 34% (R′: Zn, Ba, Sr, Ca, Mg), ZrO₂   0 to 1.5% and F 1.5 to 32%

(2) An optical glass for molding, being excellent in chemical durability and having a transformation temperature (Tg) of at most 300° C. and a specific gravity (Sg) of at most 3.1, which is represented, in term of elements for making up the glass, by the following chemical composition (wt % on oxide basis, calculated from the component composition):

Preferred Embodiment

P₂O₅  39 to 47%, Li₂O   6 to 9%, Na₂O   7 to 15%, K₂O   3 to 5%, Sum of R₂O  17 to 26% (R: Li, Na, K), Al₂O₃ 8.5 to 22%, ZnO   0 to 17%, BaO   0 to 17%, SrO   0 to 12%, CaO   0 to 10%, MgO   0 to 5%, Sum of R′O   0 to 32% (R′: Zn, Ba, Sr, Ca, Mg) and F 12 to 27%

The composition ranges of the basic application (Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-332531, WO 03/037813 A1) of the present invention is represented by mol % and claims of the present PCT application are represented by weight % on oxide basis, which are different but any of which are based on the component composition (wt %) in Examples.

Example 1 of the basic application will be illustrated.

For conversion of the representation of the component composition (mol %) in [Table 1] of the basic application into that by weight % on oxide basis, it is first returned to the component composition in [Table 6]. In this method, the mol % value of each component is multiplied by the molecular weight to give a sum total to be a denominator. Namely, the denominator will be 28.79×141.95+12.16×29.88+20.52×61.98+9.64×94.20+27.04×83.98+1.11×81.39+0.74×123.22=9082.34.

Then, the mol % value of each component is multiplied by the molecular weight to give a value to be a numerator, which is divided by the above described denominator and multiplied by 100 to give a component composition (wt %).

In the case of P₂O₅, for example, it will be:

-   -   {(28.79×141.95)÷9082.34}×100=45 (wt %)     -   Cf. [Table 6] in Basic Application.

As to the other components, the similar calculation is carried out. As such, all the components are subjected to the calculation to obtain wt % re-presentation shown in [Table 6] of the basic application.

Then, the component composition (wt %) is converted into a wt % re-presentation on oxide basis. In this method, the fluoride component in the component composition (wt %) is divided into cation and anion (F). For example, the fluoride used in Example 1 is only AlF₃: 25 wt %, which is divided into Al and F.

Since the molecular weight of AlF₃ is 83.98, the atomic weight of Al is 26.98 and the atomic weight of F is 19.00, the amount of Al in AlF₃: 25 wt % is 25×(26.98+83.98)=8.03 wt % (atomic wt %) and the amount of F in AlF₃: 25 wt % is 25×{(19.00×3)÷83.98}=16.97 wt % (atomic wt %). This means that the proportion of Al in the component composition (wt %) is 8.03 wt % and that of F is 16.97 wt %, that is, 8.03 g of Al and 16.97 g of F are present in 100 g.

Then, if Al: 8.03 wt % in AlF₃ is all oxides, the amount of Al₂O₃ is to be obtained. Since the molecular weight of Al₂O₃ is 101.96, 2Al of which corresponds to 8.03 wt %, the amount of Al₂O₃ is 8.03+{(2×26.98)÷101.96}=15.17. (This teaches that when the Al component in AlF₃: 25 g is all oxides, Al₂O₃ is 15.17 g.)

When in Table 6, calculation is carried out to be 100% as a whole by substituting AlF₃: 25 with Al₂O₃: 15.17 in the component composition (wt %) of Example 1, the weight % representation on oxide basis of Example 1 in Table 7 of the present PCT application is given. In this case, the weight of F in 100 g weight is 16.97 g (Cf. Table 7, Example 1).

It is to be noted herein that conversion of from the component composition (mol % or wt %) to a weight % on oxide basis is possible but conversion of from the weight % representation on oxide basis to the component composition is not possible. (Since the weight % representation on oxide basis shows only the weight proportion of cation, it is not clear which cation is used for the fluoride only by this information and specification of the fluoride is impossible.)

Therefore, it is understood that representation of only the weight % on oxide basis does not disclose or teach the component composition.

BEST EMBODIMENT FOR CARRYING OUT INVENTION

The low softening point glass according to the present invention is a glass of phosphate type which can mainly be used for optical uses and pre-dominantly comprises P₂O₅—Al₂O₃—R₂O—F (R: Li, Na, K), and in particular, at least 6.5% of Al₂O₃ is incorporated as a durability improving component, with success, whereby to impart an excellent chemical durability and stability which is represented by a weight loss of at most 0.3 weight % , preferably at most 0.05 weight % in a durability test. This glass has a glass transformation temperature (Tg) of 230 to 350° C., molding temperature of 270 to 400° C. and optical characteristic values i.e. refractive index (nd) at d-line of 1.43 to 1.55 and Abbe number (ν d) of 55 to 85.

In a Chemical Durability Test employed herein, a glass sample (1.5×1.5×1.0 cm) is treated in boiled distilled water for 2 hours and during the same time, a weight loss is measured and represented by percent to the initial weight.

The reasons for limiting the composition range ( % should be taken as those by weight % on oxide basis unless otherwise indicated) of each component of this low softening point, optical glass according to the present invention to the above described (1) are as follows:

P₂O₅ is a glass forming component, which is present in a proportion of 34 to 50%, since if less than 34%, glass formation is difficult, while if more than 50%, the durability is lowered. The preferred range is 39 to 47%.

Li₂O is a component for improving the melting property of the glass and for lowering the softening temperature of the glass. If the proportion thereof is less than 2%, the above described effect is not sufficient, while if more than 9%, the durability and stability are deteriorated. The preferred range is 6 to 9%.

Na₂O is a component for improving the melting property of the glass and for lowering the softening temperature, similar to Li₂O. If the proportion thereof is less than 7%, the above described effect is not sufficient, while if more than 28%, the stability and durability are deteriorated. The preferred range is 7 to 15%.

K₂O is a component for improving the melting property of the glass and for lowering the softening temperature of the glass, not so as alkaline components (Li₂O, Na₂O). If the proportion thereof is less than 3%, the above described effect is not sufficient, while if more than 27%, the durability particularly is deteriorated. The preferred range is 3 to 5%.

The sum of Li₂O, Na₂O and K₂O is 17 to 41%. If the proportion thereof is less than 17%, the effect of improving the melting property of the glass and for lowering the softening temperature is not sufficient, while if more than 41%, the stability and durability are deteriorated. The preferred range is 17 to 26%.

Al₂O₃ has an effect of improving the durability. If the proportion is less than 6.5%, the effect thereof is not sufficient and if more than 30%, the melting property of the glass is deteriorated. The preferred range is 8.5 to 22%.

ZnO is a component for improving the melting property of the glass. If the proportion exceeds 22%, the stability is deteriorated. The preferred range is 0 to 17%.

BaO is a component for improving the melting property of the glass. If the proportion exceeds 21%, the stability is deteriorated. The preferred range is 0 to 17%.

SrO is a component for improving the melting property of the glass. If the proportion exceeds 18%, the stability is deteriorated. The preferred range is 0 to 12%.

CaO is a component for improving the melting property of the glass. If the proportion exceeds 16%, the stability is deteriorated. The preferred range is 0 to 10%.

MgO is a component for improving the melting property of the glass. If the proportion exceeds 14%, the stability is deteriorated. The preferred range is 0 to 5%.

The sum of ZnO, BaO, SrO, CaO and MgO (R′O) should be 0 to 34%, since if exceeding 34%, the stability is deteriorated. The preferred range is 0 to 32%.

ZrO₂ is a component for improving the durability. If the proportion exceeds 1.5%, the melting property of the glass is deteriorated.

F is a component for improving the melting property of the glass and for lowering the softening temperature of the glass. If the proportion thereof is less than 1.5%, the above described effect is not sufficient, while if more than 32%, vaporization and others are caused, resulting in difficulty of preparing the glass. The preferred range is 12 to 27%.

Production of the low softening point optical glass according to the present invention is carried out by a conventional glass production process, using as a raw material, ordinary glass raw materials such as salts such as metaphosphates, sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, aluminum fluoride, sodium fluoride, etc. A transparent glass can be prepared by adequately melting these raw materials in a platinum crucible at a temperature of about 800 to 1100° C. and then casting the resulting adequately melted glass melt in a mold made of carbon, etc., thus obtaining a transparent glass. Then, the resulting glass is subjected to annealing at about glass transformation temperature, thus obtaining a thermally stable glass.

In these glasses, the glass transformation temperature is low, for example, about 230 to 350° C. and molding is carried out at about 270 to 400° C. The chemical durability thereof can be represented by a weight loss in distilled water in a range of at most 0.30%, which does not constitute any problem on practical use.

The following examples and comparative examples are given in order to illustrate the low softening point glass of present invention in detail without limiting the same.

EXAMPLES 1 TO 45

Using the corresponding metaphosphates, oxides, fluorides, carbonates, nitrates, etc., as a raw material of each component, the component compositions were mixed as shown in Tables 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. These materials were weighed to give 100 g as a glass weight, adequately mixed, then charged in a platinum crucible, covered, melted for several hours in an electric furnace at a temperature of 800 to 1100° C., homogenized and refined by stirring and then poured into a metallic mold, followed by gradually cooling, to obtain a clear and homogeneous glass.

In Tables 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 are shown compositions obtained by converting the component compositions of Tables 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 into weight % on oxide basis.

In Tables 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 are shown the thermal properties (glass transformation temperature (Tg), yielding point (At), thermal expansion coefficient (α) at 50–250° C.) and optical properties (refractive index (nd), Abbe number (ν d)), specific gravity (Sg) and data of the Chemical Durability Test of the resulting glasses. In the Chemical Durability Test employed herein, a glass sample (1.5×1.5×1.0 cm) was treated in boiled distilled water for 2 hours, during which a weight loss was measured and represented by percent to the initial weight.

In the composition of Example 43, the raw materials were mixed so as to give a glass weight of 30 g, melted at 900° C. for 30 minutes in an analogous manner to Comparative Example 1 and then the glass weight was measured to obtain a weight loss.

Thus, the weight loss of about 1.4% was confirmed. In Comparative Example 1, the weight loss reaches 15.9% by only fluorine this indicates that vaporization was suppressed in Example 43.

In the composition of Example 41, the raw materials were mixed so as to give a glass weight of 600 g and melted at 1000° C. for 2 hours. The melting was carried out in a similar manner three times to examine change of the refractive index and consequently it was found that the refractive index difference by nd was well in agreement with 0.00014.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1

Example 19 of the Corning Publication was employed as Comparative Example 1. The batch composition is shown in Table 6 and the weight % composition of oxide basis obtained from the batch composition is shown in Table 11. In Table 16, there are shown the main properties and analytical values shown in Table 2 of the Corning Publication.

TABLE 1 Composition Range Oxide JP-B-59-033545 Basis Composition free (wt %) Present Invention from CdO, PbO P₂O₅ 34.58 to 49.9  50.71 to 79.89 Li₂O 2.64 to 8.41   0 to 5.54 Na₂O  7.34 to 27.24   0 to 7.52 K₂O  3.24 to 26.53    0 to 12.24 R₂O 17.86 to 40.71  9.36 to 16.04 Al₂O₃  6.55 to 29.66  3.99 to 10.99 ZnO   0 to 21.4    0 to 24.83 BaO    0 to 20.21    0 to 34.20 SrO    0 to 17.02    0 to 26.09 CaO    0 to 15.15    0 to 18.53 MgO    0 to 13.57  0 to 14 CdO — — PbO — — ZrO₂   0 to 1.19 — F  1.81 to 31.99 10.06 to 42.45 F/Al 0.37 to 7.00  3.63 to 14.07

TABLE 2 Examples wt % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 P₂O₅ 45 37 29 45 45 40 40 40 40 40 Li₂O 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 LiF 10 4 Na₂O 14 14 14 14 14 14 24 NaF 24 24 24 K₂O 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 KF 20 10 Al₂O₃ 9 15 10 22 5 15 AlF₃ 25 33 41 17 1 7 12 17 7 ZnO 1 1 1 1 5 ZnF₂ BaO 6 BaF₂ 8 SrO SrF₂ CaO CaF₂ MgO MgF₂ ZrO₂ 1 1 1 1 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

TABLE 3 Examples wt % 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 P₂O₅ 30 40 40 45 45 45 45 45 40 40 Li₂O 4 4 4 3 3 3 8 4 4 LiF 4 Na₂O 14 14 7 7 25 NaF 24 10 24 25 14 21 18 K₂O 10 10 10 5 5 5 10 10 10 KF 10 25 Al₂O₃ 10 5 10 15 15 17 20 15 13 AlF₃ 22 17 17 7 5 3 ZnO 10 ZnF₂ BaO 15 BaF₂ 15 SrO SrF₂ CaO CaF₂ MgO MgF₂ ZrO₂ Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

TABLE 4 Examples wt % 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 P₂O₅ 45 45 45 40 43 45 40 44 44 46 Li₂O 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5.5 5 6 LiF 2 Na₂O 14 14 14 15 9 10 NaF 13 4 5 10 10 10 K₂O 8 6 6 8 6 5 7 5.5 6 5 KF Al₂O₃ 7 13 10 5 5 5 AlF₃ 25 25 21 22 10 12 10 10 13 ZnO 20 15 ZnF₂ 17 10 20 BaO 20 BaF₂ SrO 10 SrF₂ CaO 6 CaF₂ MgO 4 11 MgF₂ ZrO₂ Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

TABLE 5 Examples wt % 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 P₂O₅ 40 40 40 40 40 40 43 40 35 40 Li₂O 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 LiF 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 2 2 Na₂O 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 NaF 11 11 11 11 11 9 6 10 10 10 K₂O 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 3 3 KF Al₂O₃ 5 10 AlF₃ 22 24 16 24 16 13 25 13 25 ZnO 10 10 10 ZnF₂ BaO BaF₂ 21 5 SrO 5 SrF₂ 10 18 5 5 CaO 5 3 CaF₂ 10 18 MgO 2 MgF₂ 12 18 2 ZrO₂ Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

TABLE 6 Examples Comparative wt % 41 42 43 44 45 wt % Example 1 P₂O₅ 35 35 40 40 35 Al(PO₃)₃ 44.7 Li₂O 5 5 5 5 5 KPF₆ 29 LiF 2 2 2 2 2 NaPF₆ 26.3 Na₂O 5 5 NaF 10 10 10 10 10 K₂O 3 3 3 3 3 KF Al₂O₃ AlF₃ 15 15 10 25 30 ZnO 5 5 15 ZnF₂ BaO 10 5 BaF₂ 5 SrO 5 10 5 5 SrF₂ 5 CaO 5 5 5 5 5 CaF₂ 5 MgO MgF₂ 5 ZrO₂ Total 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100

TABLE 7 Oxide Basis Examples wt % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 P₂O₅ 49.90 42.52 34.58 48.74 47.18 43.97 43.71 42.69 42.87 45.78 Li₂O 4.44 4.60 4.77 4.34 6.05 4.40 4.37 4.27 4.29 2.64 Na₂O 15.53 16.09 16.69 15.17 14.69 19.47 15.30 18.90 25.71 20.27 K₂O 11.09 11.49 11.92 10.83 10.48 10.99 17.72 10.67 10.71 9.28 Al₂O₃ 16.83 23.01 29.66 11.18 10.06 21.16 18.89 23.47 16.42 22.03 ZnO 1.10 1.14 1.19 1.08 5.25 BaO 7.58 6.29 SrO CaO MgO ZrO₂ 1.11 1.15 1.19 1.08 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Weight of 16.97 22.40 27.83 13.27 8.00 15.61 14.68 10.86 11.54 21.81 F in 100 g (g)

TABLE 8 Oxide Basis Examples wt % 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 P₂O₅ 36.81 44.10 43.75 49.47 48.16 47.24 45.91 47.28 42.33 41.98 Li₂O 2.83 4.41 4.38 4.40 3.20 3.14 3.05 8.41 4.24 4.20 Na₂O 21.74 23.57 15.32 19.47 27.24 7.34 25.51 10.86 16.40 13.95 K₂O 9.95 11.02 10.93 10.99 5.35 26.53 5.10 10.51 10.58 10.49 Al₂O₃ 28.67 16.89 11.28 15.66 16.06 15.75 20.43 22.93 15.88 13.64 ZnO 10.58 BaO 14.35 15.74 SrO CaO MgO ZrO₂ Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Weight of 31.99 16.06 14.79 15.61 11.31 8.18 3.39 8.37 9.50 8.14 F in 100 g (g)

TABLE 9 Oxide Basis Examples wt % 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 P₂O₅ 49.90 49.90 49.04 43.79 48.29 45.48 43.96 47.07 49.32 49.86 Li₂O 4.44 4.44 4.36 4.38 4.50 4.05 5.65 5.90 5.60 6.51 Na₂O 15.53 15.53 15.26 16.42 10.78 12.08 15.05 7.90 8.28 8.00 K₂O 8.87 6.65 6.54 8.75 6.74 5.05 7.69 5.89 6.73 5.42 Al₂O₃ 16.83 16.82 13.90 14.62 14.68 13.14 19.00 11.85 12.41 13.96 ZnO 15.02 8.64 21.40 17.65 16.25 BaO 20.21 SrO 10.90 CaO 6.66 MgO 4.43 12.03 ZrO₂ Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Weight of 16.97 16.97 14.25 14.93 18.92 1.81 15.55 11.31 18.66 13.35 F in 100 g (g)

TABLE 10 Oxide Basis Examples wt % 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 P₂O₅ 47.73 47.38 46.88 46.78 45.85 46.65 45.90 46.14 39.21 46.60 Li₂O 6.65 6.60 6.53 6.52 6.39 6.50 7.35 7.10 6.90 7.17 Na₂O 15.65 15.53 15.37 15.34 15.03 13.58 11.14 8.52 8.28 8.61 K₂O 4.77 4.74 4.69 4.68 4.58 4.66 5.34 3.46 3.36 3.49 Al₂O₃ 15.94 17.25 11.38 17.04 11.13 15.03 10.67 17.50 8.85 17.68 ZnO 11.53 11.20 11.64 BaO 19.60 4.91 SrO 9.65 17.02 10.23 4.81 CaO 8.50 15.15 5.76 3.36 MgO 9.26 13.57 3.70 ZrO₂ Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Weight of 27.96 26.87 25.33 25.02 22.01 24.61 10.93 22.96 18.63 24.47 F in 100 g (g)

TABLE 11 Oxide Oxide Basis Examples Basis Comparative wt % 41 42 43 44 45 wt % Example 1 P₂O₅ 39.25 40.00 43.20 46.14 41.29 P₂O₅ 73.62 Li₂O 6.91 7.04 6.65 7.10 7.27 Na₂O 6.12 Na₂O 8.29 8.45 7.98 14.27 14.60 K₂O 9.36 K₂O 3.37 3.43 3.24 3.46 3.54 Al₂O₃ 10.89 Al₂O₃ 10.22 10.41 6.55 17.50 21.50 ZnO 5.61 5.72 16.19 BaO 16.12 5.72 SrO 4.63 5.72 10.80 5.77 5.90 CaO 5.60 9.82 5.39 5.76 5.90 MgO 3.70 ZrO₂ Total 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 Weight of F 18.77 21.65 12.78 22.96 26.35 Weight of F 36 in 100 g in 100 g (g) (g)

TABLE 12 Examples 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Tg (° C.) 308 329 348 276 299 332 316 326 287 336 At (° C.) 342 366 374 309 331 358 342 354 317 372 ^(α)50–250° C. 195 193 185 218 192 188 197 180 219 193 (×10⁻⁷° C.⁻¹) Loss Ratio (%) 0.009 0.004 0.092 0.164 0.097 0.009 0.031 0.027 0.023 0.007 Specific Gravity (Sg.) 2.71 2.77 2.83 2.82 2.8 2.75 2.71 2.7 2.68 2.75 nd 1.47779 1.46673 1.45547 1.48671 1.51066 1.48492 1.48087 1.49223 1.48078 1.46389 nF − nC 0.00652 0.00614 0.0057 0.00684 0.00761 0.00664 0.00659 0.00705 0.00693 0.00609 νd 73.3 76 79.9 71.2 67.1 73 73 69.8 69.4 76.2 F/Al Ratio 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.45 2.24 2.18 2.28 1.33 2.02 3.04

TABLE 13 Examples 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Tg (° C.) 316 298 269 316 328 322 317 340 320 319 At (° C.) 352 327 299 350 354 351 351 365 344 356 ^(α)50–250° C. 209 223 228 203 201 196 191 163 185 174 (×10⁻⁷° C.⁻¹) Loss Ratio (%) 0.025 0.079 0.086 0.03 0.008 0.046 0.032 0.003 0.007 0.008 Specific Gravity (Sg.) 2.78 2.71 2.86 2.69 2.71 2.65 2.62 2.67 2.83 2.94 nd 1.43269 1.4716 1.48095 1.47931 1.48658 1.49151 1.49904 1.50916 1.50624 1.5148 nF − nC 0.00526 0.0065 0.00669 0.00659 0.00694 0.00691 0.00766 0.0073 0.00756 0.00753 νd 82.3 72.6 71.9 72.7 70.1 71.1 65.1 69.7 67 68.4 F/Al Ratio 3.68 2.81 3.85 2.94 2.02 1.46 0.45 1.03 1.70 1.68

TABLE 14 Examples 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Tg (° C.) 329 317 305 350 287 350 339 326 277 324 At (° C.) 368 358 343 385 323 386 369 354 306 360 ^(α)50–250° C. 182 181 192 170 184 164 171 153 185 155 (×10⁻⁷° C.⁻¹) Loss Ratio (%) 0.007 0.007 0.01 0.037 0.022 0.005 0 0.004 0.042 0.006 Specific Gravity (Sg.) 2.72 2.74 2.82 2.78 2.85 3 2.85 2.98 2.87 2.9 nd 1.47722 1.4827 1.48796 1.48998 1.4824 1.54259 1.49691 1.52052 1.48903 1.51049 nF − nC 0.0062 0.00648 0.00879 0.00677 0.00678 0.00816 0.00702 0.00831 0.00697 0.00733 νd 77 74.5 55.5 72.4 71.2 66.5 70.8 62.6 70.2 69.6 F/Al Ratio 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.88 0.37 2.41 2.74 4.52 2.78

TABLE 15 Examples 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Tg (° C.) 292 254 237 255 234 326 318 295 274 284 At (° C.) 318 287 264 285 261 364 350 329 311 314 ^(α)50–250° C. 197 215 259 228 272 182 186 164 181 182 (×10⁻⁷° C.⁻¹) Loss Ratio (%) 0.062 0.27 0.22 0.19 0.27 0.045 0.012 0.008 0.007 0.02 Specific Gravity (Sg.) 2.71 2.71 2.7 2.79 2.84 2.76 2.97 2.87 2.98 2.9 nd 1.46083 1.45388 1.45974 1.45507 1.46283 1.46517 1.51682 1.48189 1.5034 1.47619 nF − nC 0.006 0.00574 0.00619 0.0059 0.00618 0.006 0.00739 0.00647 0.00711 0.00638 νd 76.8 79.1 74.3 77.1 74.9 77.5 69.9 74.5 70.8 74.6 F/Al Ratio 5.62 4.95 7.00 4.61 6.08 5.12 2.93 4.06 6.33 4.33

TABLE 16 Examples Comparative 41 42 43 44 45 Example 1 Tg (° C.) 260 282 280 295 294 290 At (° C.) 294 316 317 331 331 ^(α)50–250° C. 197 185 175 182 190 (×10⁻⁷° C.⁻¹) Loss Ratio (%) 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.015 0.004 Specific Gravity (Sg.) 3.07 2.98 3.06 2.8 2.82 F Batch Weight 36 F Analytic Value 18.1 nd 1.49628 1.48993 1.52008 1.47162 1.46434 1.45 nF − nC 0.00682 0.00663 0.00763 0.00617 0.0059 νd 72.8 73.9 68.2 76.4 78.7 F/Al Ratio 5.53 6.38 5.65 4.06 3.88 11.13

Utility of Present Invention of Commercial Scale

As illustrated above, the inventors have tried to develop a glass of fluorophosphate type capable of being subjected to molding at a temperature of at most 400° C. and consequently have reached an epoch-making glass composition. According to the present invention, it is considered that a micro optical element can be molded with high producibility, which has hitherto been considered difficult. Furthermore, the optical glass of the present invention is so excellent in chemical durability that it is of high practical value. 

1. An optical glass for molding, being excellent in chemical durability and having a transformation temperature (Tg) of at most 350° C., a chemical durability represented by a weight loss in distilled water in a range of at most 0.30%, and a specific gravity (Sg) of at most 3.1, which is represented, in term of elements for making up the glass, by the following chemical composition (wt % on oxide basis, calculated from the component composition): P₂O₅  39 to 47%, Li₂O   2 to 9%, Na₂O   7 to 28%, K₂O   3 to 27%, Sum of R₂O  17 to 41% (R: Li, Na, K), Al₂O₃ 6.5 to 30%, ZnO   0 to 22%, BaO   0 to 17%, SrO   0 to 18%, CaO   0 to 16%, MgO   0 to 14%, Sum of R′O   0 to 34% (R′: Zn, Ba, Sr, Ca, Mg), ZrO₂   0 to 1.5% and F 1.5 to 32%. 